Study Area Overview in the City of Atlanta
Problem(s) Addressed:
The study examines the community needs and challenges within Atlanta's Peoplestown and Summerhill neighborhoods. The Center Parc Credit Union funded it to assess the community needs and challenges of these rapidly changing and gentrifying neighborhoods. It gives a historical background of these areas by showing how they have changed over time through urban renewal projects, stadium developments, and the effects of projects like the Atlanta BeltLine. The study presents findings from resident surveys and focus groups conducted in late 2022 and early 2023, providing insights into housing stability, financial strain, perceptions of safety and amenities, and banking practices. In the end, the paper finds ways for Center Parc Credit Union to help the community and stresses the need for city officials to be more responsive to residents' concerns about infrastructure and development.
Demographic and Socioeconomic Characteristics of the Study Area
Methods:
Mixed-Methods Design:
Surveys: Door-to-door and online surveys of 187 residents were administered to find out about their housing stability, safety, amenities, and banking habits.
Focus Groups: Four virtual sessions with 10 residents were conducted exploring gentrification impacts, crime, and infrastructure.
Secondary Data: Census tract data (2010–2021) was analyzed to track demographic/socioeconomic shifts.
Key Findings:
Demographics: Neighborhoods experienced discernible increase in household income and educational attainment as a result of gentrification. But homeownership rates barely changed, and the racial makeup remained largely Black population.
Housing and Financial Stress: Renters faced much greater financial strain than homeowners, despite the fact that the majority of residents reported stable housing conditions. Few locals voiced worries about being uprooted.
Neighborhood Challenges: According to locals, the main problems were traffic, speeding, parking shortages, and crime (such as auto thefts). Financial stability and perceived safety were related; residents who were struggling financially felt less secure.
Amenities and Services: The most sought-after but inaccessible amenities were pharmacies and supermarkets (like Publix). Despite being heavily used, parks needed upkeep.
Banking Practices: Residents frequently used credit unions. One of the most effective ways to draw in new users is to lower fees, especially for homeowners who are struggling financially.
Governance Gaps: Despite community advocacy, focus groups revealed the city's disregard for residents' concerns and infrastructure.
Neighborhood Amenities that are Currently Used/Available
Recommendations:
Credit Union Initiatives:
Provide discounted services and financial seminars on home repairs and purchases.
Contribute to neighborhood projects like green areas, home renovations, and infrastructure advocacy (such as sidewalks and speed bumps).
Community Advocacy:
To bring residents' concerns to the attention of city officials, collaborate with Neighborhood Planning Units (NPUs).
Encourage inclusive development (e.g., affordable groceries beyond Publix).
Municipal Actions:
Address infrastructure gaps (parking, traffic safety) and increase police presence.
Engage residents in redevelopment planning to prevent displacement.
Opportunities to Improve Neighborhood Infrastructure
Research Team
Deirdre Oakley
Erin Ruel
Tanya Washington
Graduate Student Authors
Lucas Cortelloni
Rafia Mallick